This is your first impression. Make it work for you.
Make your 'ACCROCHE' show not only understanding of the documents and the question, but also broader vision of the issues and context beyond the documents.
Import an exterior idea / context / issue to show awareness.
Do not just list documents, sources, authors and types. Give meaning to each document using our vocabulary list (argues that... demonstrates that... suggests that... illustrates...)
Do not just explain them and define them. Analyse them, exploit them, use them as a lever to show your broader understanding of societal trends and phenomena.
Define them, compare them, contrast them, bring in outside information.
Each paragraph is an argument. YOUR ARGUMENT.
Use and compare TWO DOCUMENTS to support your argument.
Do not fall into the trap of ONE PARAGRAPH = ONE DOCUMENT.
Your final, lasting impression. Make it count. Open up the debate.
As we have clearly seen.. / demonstrated...
Despite... the questions remains...
Moving forward, it might be asked whether.... if... who... how.... exactly when...
Whilst caution is recommended... there is hope in....
INTRODUCTON : UK = DIVERSE but INTEGRATION / UNITY / REPRESENTATION = FAILED ?
IMPORTED EVIDENCE : Tensions building after 2005 terror attacks >> 2025 immigration riots.
PARAGRAPH 1 : REPRESENTATION IN GOUVERNEMENT = REAL FIGURES BUT REAL EMPOWERMENT ?
IMPORTED EVIDENCE :
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak, son of immigrants and multi-millionaire... but representative ?
PARAGRAPH 2 : UNEVEN GEOGRAPHICAL DSITRIBUTION = UNEVEN PERCEPTIONS / REPRESENTATION
IMPORTED IDEAS : Huge density in London, harmonious, as demonstrated by Notting Hill Carnival
but contradicted by race riots in from people in small towns or rural areas.
IMPORTED IDEAS : ATTEMPTS AT SHARED NATIONAL NARRATIVES (2012 Opening Ceremony)
PARAGRAPH 3 : AUTHOR'S PERSONAL EXPERIENCE : ACCEPTANCE & INTEGRATION vs EXCLUSION
CONCLUSION : YOUR FINAL IMPRESSION :)
HISTORICAL DIVERSITY is a fact in the UK (Colonialist history, windrush etc).
COLOUR-BLIND CITIES LIVING IN HARMONY vs MOUNTING RURAL TENSIONS (BREXIT)
IMPORTED IDEA : Fuelled by social media and Cambridge Analytica style manipulations
POSSIBILITIES TO CHANGE ATTITUDES IMPORTED IDEA : EXAMPLE OF BRIDGERTON
Article, report...
Extract from.... a novel / short story / diary / biography / autobiograpghy
Survey, gouvernement document...
Written by... (article, novel...)
Published by... (book, magazine, research paper...)
Produced by... (film, video) Broadcast by... (news, BBC...)
Composed by... (music / song)
In document A : In the article from the Washington Post....
The document : This article demonstrates that...
Document A says : According to the journalist...
The document states : As stated in the article...
The document refers to : The article quotes...
In Document B : In the detailed financial report...
In document C : However, in the extract from X's novel...
According to the author...
As this report clearly demonstrates...
As is clear from the text...
illustrates, shows, demonstrates...
argues that..., suggest that..., would have us believe that...
Together, these documents invite us to consider / explore / understand [SUBJECT]
and define / decide / explain / justify [CONCLUSION DEPENDING ON QUESTION].
Taken together, these documents lead us to consider [SUBJECT] and to [ANSWER THE QUESTION].
Together, these documents raise the issue of [SUBJECT] and allow us to [reach a conclusion / take a position].
When considered together, these documents shed light on [SUBJECT] and help us [address the question].
...these documents reveal... ...illustrate...
The broad issue.... The wider question is... There is a general tendency towards....
...however... ...yet... ...whereas...
Research shows that (details)... Further reading demonstrates that.... Experts argue that...
As we know from [OUTSIDE DATA / EXAMPLE]
...which leads us to ask : [RHETORICAL QUESTION]
...which begs the questions : [RHETORICAL QUESTION]
...which means that [CONCLUSION | INTERPRETATION].
Mention other RELATED phenomena, issues, documents or events even just briefly or lightly. Show your breadth of understanding and wealth of cultural knowledge and awareness.
TENSION : As was demonstrated by the recent anti-immigration riots.
UNITY : As demonstrated throughout sixty years of the Notting Hill carnival.
NARRATIVES / SHARED IDENTITIES: As illustrated by the diverse national storytelling of the 2012 London Olympics opening ceremony.
UNITY / NON-DIVISION : As argued by London Mayor Ken Livingstone after the 2007 terrorist attacks.
You can talk about areas (political area, educational area) but try and diversify :
In the cultural sphere.
In the political realm.
In the world of business.
In the educational sphere.
Try also : In terms of.... In terms of education... In terms of politics....
...with regards... ...with regards business... with regards education...
Why do we say THE U.K. and THE U.S.A. but not THE Great Britain.
We use THE when the country’s name:
contains a common noun (kingdom, states, republic, federation, emirates)
describes a political structure or system
The Kingdom that is Royal. The States that are United. The Republic that is Democratic.
Toucher le public | Reach an audience
Il était très touché par l'expérience | He was greatly affected / moved by the experience...
Vary your connectors and include high level connectors such as
whereas, despite, given that, in light of... MORE LOGICAL CONNECTORS HERE
She HAVE ????? The countries IS ???? It runS ?????
SHE for a country or a thing ???? Many or much (check here) ?
Since = starting point (Since 2020)
For = duration (For 6 years)
Media is plural already. Never with an S.
Comme vs tel que : replace 'like' by 'such as'
Example, example AND example.
Grow (statistics, demographics). Grow up = childhood grandir
Currently... In modern Britain...
Over recent years... | More recently...
SINCE 1973 | For over fifty years....
SINCE 5PM | For a few hours...
SINCE THE SPRING | For the last few season...
SINCE I WAS A BOY
SINCE THE WAR
Firstly, we will see... | Firstly, we will examine / explore / investigate / analyse / define | Firstly, an examination of [X] will demonstrate [Y]
As you can see... | It is therefore clear that... It is evident that... Clearly / evidently... It is noticeable that... It might therefore be noted that...
As we will see... | As will become clear... As will be seen later ('see' mais passif)... ...as will be examined in due course / later...
As we have seen... | As observed previously/earlier, ... As noted earlier on,... As previously stated....
Diversity refers to the variety of ethnic backgrounds within a population.
It describes who is present in a society, without implying action or intention.
A society can be diverse even if different groups do not have equal access to power or visibility.
Integration refers to the process by which individuals or groups become part of the shared social, cultural, and civic life of a society.
It involves participation in common institutions (school, work, public space) and the ability to interact within shared norms, while not necessarily erasing cultural differences.
Integration focuses on functioning together within the same social framework.
Inclusion refers to deliberate actions and policies aimed at ensuring that people from minority groups are actively included and valued in all areas of society, such as education, culture, media, and politics.
Inclusion is not only about presence, but about participation, access, and equal opportunity.
Representation refers to the visible presence of people from ethnic minorities in positions of authority or public influence, such as political leadership, the media, law enforcement, or education.
When representation increases, it can influence decision-making, public narratives, and institutional priorities, making them more reflective of diverse experiences.
It also has a symbolic effect: young people from minority backgrounds may feel legitimised and encouraged to aspire to roles they see occupied by people with similar life experiences.
The ability to act and affect change.
IDEAS TO IMPORT
Lyrics : Born in the USA
Bruce Springsteen's speech
Notions and symbols of freedom
Fragility of these freedoms
Fragility of democracy under Trump
1. JE COMMENCE PAR UNE PHRASE DIRECTEMENT LIÉ AU SUJET
Cette phrase démontre que je sais de quoi je parle. Je sais de quoi parlent les documents.
Je sais en quel thématique et en quel monde si situe le sujets des documents au délà du contenu des documents.
2. J'UTILISE OU J'IMPORTE UNE CITATION / NOTION VUE EN CLASSE OU UN FAIT D'ACTUALITÉ PRÉCIS
MAIS... J'ÉVITE TOUTE GÉNÉRALITÉ VAGUE OU ANECDOTE DÉCORATIVE
Je n'ajoute pas des phrases hors sujet : je suis là pour comprendre et exploité les textes fournis. Cependant, j'essaie de 'parfumer' et 'colorer' mon travail avec les éléments extérieurs vus en classe ou dans mes lectures personnels.
J'ajoute et j'inclue des éléments discrètement : parfois en fin de phrase :
OPTION 1 :
When Andy Warhol famously suggested that America means different things to different people, he implicitly pointed to the tension at the heart of the American Dream: a promise that endures precisely because it is experienced, interpreted, and judged in radically unequal ways.
OPTION 2 :
The American Dream, thanks to its presentation in American cinema and literature promises opportunity and self-fulfillment. Yet for those who pursue it, this promise frequently turns into a test marked by disillusion, inequality, and sacrifice.
OPTION 3 :
In a context marked by increasingly restrictive immigration policies under Donald Trump, the American Dream continues to shape aspirations worldwide, even as it places severe social, emotional, and economic demands on those who attempt to achieve it.
OPTION 4 :
Built on successive waves of immigration, the American Dream remains a powerful horizon of hope, while simultaneously confronting migrants with social, economic, and emotional challenges that often undermine that promise.
OPTION 5 :
Even when it fails to deliver the better life it promises, the American Dream continues to influence individual trajectories, raising questions about why a repeatedly challenged ideal refuses to disappear.
J'IDENTIFIE LA NATURE / SOURCE / FONCTION DE CHAQUE DOCUMENT TRÈS RAPIDEMENT ET DANS UNE SEULE PHRASE (OU DEUX) SI POSSIBLE.
LES CONNECTEURS LOGIQUES VONT M'AIDER
JE FAIS RESSORTIR UN POINT COMMUN OU UNE OPPOSITION CLAIRE ENTRE EUX
EXAMPLE A:
THE ESSAY ABOUT THE AMERICAN DREAM
Taken together, the three documents offer contrasting perspectives on the American Dream as lived, imagined, and sometimes abandoned : while Document A, an extract from Luke Healy’s semi-autobiographical graphic novel Americana, reflects his family’s differing experiences of emigration to the United States, the quotation attributed to Andy Warhol highlights the subjective nature of the American Dream, and Tara Zahra’s article in The New York Times shows that the dream continues to endure despite the large number of immigrants who ultimately return to their homelands.
EXAMPLE B :
AN ESSAY ABOUT UK IMMIGRATION
Each of the three documents offers a perspective on issues of diversity and representation in modern Britain,
Whereas document A, an article by Richard Thomson in the UK's Sunday Times, --presents-- a positive interpretation of the UK's economic need for immigration,
...a vision shared with the film director Danny Biyle --as illustrated by-- the quotation attributed to him,
...the extract from far fight leader Nigel Farage's 2022 speech clearly --demonstrates-- that all British citizens do not share this vision.
EXAMPLE : WHEREAS
If document A, an article by Richard Thomson in the UK's Sunday Times, presents a positive interpretation of the UK's economic need for immigration,
...a vision shared with the film director Danny Biyle according to the quotation attributed to him,
...then the extract from far fight leader Nigel Farage's 2022 speech clearly demonstrates that all British citizens are not of the same opinion.
JE REFORME LA QUESTION AVEC MES PROPRES MOTS
JE NE REPRENDS PAS MOT À MOT L'INTITULÉ DU SUJET
EXAMPLE : AMERICAN DREAM vs SUBJECTIVE VISIONS OF AMERICAN DREAM vs BAD EXPERIENCES
Taking into account their specificities, show how these documents illustrate the persistence of the American Dream and how it challenges those who have chosen to pursue it.
EXAMPLE A :
The American Dream is often associated with the hope of a better life, but expectations depend on cultural background and personal experiences of American mythology in popular culture. When reality fails to meet these hopes, and at a time when Donald Trumps is continually rewriting the rules about who enters and who stays, what keeps the American Dream alive in the collective consciousness?
EXAMPLE B :
The American Dream is often associated with the hope of a better life, yet expectations vary according to cultural background and personal experiences of American mythology in popular culture. When reality fails to meet these hopes, and as Donald Trump continues to rewrite the rules about who enters and who stays, what allows the American Dream to endure in the collective consciousness?
J'ANNONCE UNE PROGRESSION LOGIQUE DE REFLÉXION
CHAQUE PARTIE A UN OBJECTIF CLAIR, PAS UNE SIMPLE IDÉE
EXAMPLE :
This essay will first examine how the documents construct and convey the ideal of the American Dream, then analyze the gaps between this ideal and the realities experienced by those who pursue it, and finally explore the symbolic, cultural, and political mechanisms that allow the American Dream to endure in the collective consciousness despite its contradictions.
Even when it fails to deliver the better life it promises, the American Dream continues to influence individual trajectories, raising questions about why a repeatedly challenged ideal refuses to disappear. Taken together, the three documents offer contrasting perspectives on the American Dream as lived, imagined, and sometimes abandoned : while Document A, an extract from Luke Healy’s semi-autobiographical graphic novel Americana, reflects his family’s differing experiences of emigration to the United States, the quotation attributed to Andy Warhol highlights the subjective nature of the American Dream, and Tara Zahra’s article in The New York Times shows that the dream continues to endure despite the large number of immigrants who ultimately return to their homelands. Although the American Dream is often associated with the hope of a better life, expectations depend on cultural background and personal experiences of American mythology in popular culture. When reality fails to meet these hopes, and at a time when Donald Trumps is continually rewriting the rules about who enters and who stays, what keeps the American Dream alive in the collective consciousness? This essay will first examine how the documents construct and convey the ideal of the American Dream, then analyze the gaps between this ideal and the realities experienced by those who pursue it, and finally explore the symbolic, cultural, and political mechanisms that allow the American Dream to endure in the collective consciousness despite its contradictions.
JE RÉPONDS CLAIREMENT À LA PROBLÉMATIQUE
As demonstrated throughout the preceeding analysis, the documents show that the American Dream persists not because it is consistently fulfilled, but because it remains adaptable, subjective, and deeply embedded in cultural narratives.
JE FAIS UNE SYNTHÈSE DES IDÉES, PAS UN RÉSUMÉ DES DOCUMENTS
While individual experiences often expose the social, emotional, and political costs of pursuing this ideal, the dream continues to function as a powerful framework of meaning that allows failure, return, and disillusionment to coexist with hope, inclusion and achievement.
JE PROPOSE UNE SEULE OUVERTURE PRÉCISE
ELLE EST CULTURELLE, HISTORIQUE ET CONTEMPORAINE
JE FAIS UN LIEN AVEC UN AUTRE THÈME AMC OU UN AUTRE AIRE DU MONDE ANGLOPHONE
LA CONCLUSION DONNE LA DERNIÈRE IMPRESSION DE MON EFFICACITÉ
ELLE DOIT MONTRER QUE JE PRENDS DE L'HAUTEUR
Despite increasingly restrictive immigration policies and a political climate shaped by the current US administration, the American Dream survives less as a concrete promise than as a shared imaginary capable of absorbing exclusion, disappointment, and return without disappearing.
Moving forward, in a context marked by shifting political realities, rising social tensions, travel bans, suspended visas, and deportation policies, it remains uncertain whether the American Dream will continue to function as a global beacon of hope.
As access to the United States becomes increasingly selective, those seeking security, stability, and a better future for their families may begin to question the promise itself and turn their aspirations elsewhere.
Consequently, the future of the American Dream might ultimately depend on the capacity of America's story tellers to export such positive narratives of hope, resilience and solidarity as might restore the USA's 'brand image' in the eyes of "the tired, the poor and the huddled masses" that New York's stylised Libertas has always sought to welcome.
In the United States, liberal usually means left of center.
It is associated with support for welfare policies, public healthcare, regulation of markets, and civil rights.
In much of Europe, liberal often means economically right of center.
It is linked to free markets, low regulation, private enterprise, and limited state intervention.
So a “liberal” politician in France or Germany may defend ideas that an American liberal would oppose.
The word covers at least two political traditions that are partly opposed.
Classical liberalism
Individual freedom
Free markets
Limited government
Strong property rights
Think 18th and 19th century thinkers reacting against monarchy and absolute power.
Modern (or social) liberalism
Individual rights plus social protection
State intervention to reduce inequality
Public services such as education and healthcare
Both claim the label “liberal”, but they answer different questions about the role of the state.
Originally, liberalism was a radical idea.
It challenged kings, churches, and inherited privilege.
Over time, especially in the US, the word moved leftward.
It came to mean protecting individuals not only from the state, but also from economic and social domination.
In Europe, the word stayed closer to its economic roots.
Same word, different historical paths.
In everyday debate, “liberal” is often used vaguely or strategically.
Sometimes it means “left-wing”.
Sometimes it means “pro-market”.
Sometimes it is just a label of approval or criticism.
This blurs meaning further and turns the word into a signal rather than a definition.
At the core, liberalism is about freedom.
But freedom from what, and freedom for whom?
Freedom from state control?
Freedom from poverty?
Freedom to compete?
Freedom to be protected?
Different answers produce different liberalisms.
“Liberalism” is confusing because:
it changes meaning across countries
it refers to multiple traditions
it evolved historically in different directions
it is used loosely in public debate
it rests on a contested idea of freedom